We should add a licence. I think we more or less concluded we would release the source code under the MIT licence and the code under CC BY-SA. Or maybe just CC BY? @patek-devs?
We should add a licence. I think we more or less concluded we would release the source code under the MIT licence and the code under CC BY-SA. Or maybe just CC BY? @patek-devs?
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
We should add a licence. I think we more or less concluded we would release the source code under the MIT licence and the code under CC BY-SA. Or maybe just CC BY? @patek-devs?
changed due date to September 12, 2019
changed due date to September 13, 2019
You mean the content, right?
Yes
removed due date
changed due date to December 11, 2019
Well, I agree.
If @vojta001 agrees as well, let's add the licences then ?
mentioned in merge request !11
closed via merge request !11
mentioned in commit
710b7ad71c